If we learned anything from the 2016 election (and I’m not yet sure we have), it’s that every single one of us is capable of believing only the version of truth we want to hear, and tuning out the views that threaten ours. Reality is suddenly an opinion, not a fact, and the passion with which people defend their divergent versions of it has reached the boiling point.
This can include blindness to ugly truths, like corruption, lies, racism or misogyny – and it can also include what I have in the past called “breathing our own exhaust”: simply sitting in our comfortable echo chambers and telling each other how fabulous we are. What seems more urgent than ever is the need to rediscover a shared truth for our country again – a common reality upon which we can mostly agree, so that we can move on, for example, to fighting over what to do about climate change instead of arguing over whether it is simply a ruse invented by China.
I’ve been working on my personal contribution to a common reality long before the last election, but it now seems even more important than it did before. It grew out of a conviction that social design is the best method for solving the seemingly intractable problems we face, and that we don’t yet have a concrete or evidence-based way to prove it.
What seems more urgent than ever is the need to rediscover a shared truth for our country.
We Need a Way to Measure Design
Right now, big money and pioneering organizations on the front lines of all the wicked issues we’re battling, from climate change to poverty to food insecurity, are also placing major bets that design is the methodology that improves outcomes. But in this new territory, how does social innovation design work, really, and how do we know? We see evidence, but no one has undertaken a comprehensive effort to set standards for measuring it, so we can adapt it more broadly and scale it.
Social design is the best method for solving the seemingly intractable problems we face.
On January 24th in New York City, a group of diversely extraordinary funders, practitioners, corporations, designers, entrepreneurs and government employees will gather to compare best practices in measuring social design’s impact on human health.
Here, at the very first Measured Summit, we will begin to coalesce around a way to codify social design. It’s important for a number of reasons:
- To understand, in a way that can be communicated broadly, what it is, how it works and how to make it better.
- To know when it’s most useful and how to best make the case for this approach over traditional methods.
- To establish and communicate standards.
- To find more aligned ways of working to improve outcomes.
- To concretize and teach techniques.
- To engage more practitioners and attract more participants and partners.
- To identify skills, mindsets, and tools in order to make them widely available.
Why This Matters for Entrepreneurs
Entrepreneurs are creators, and the essential components of the creative process are: to have a vision; take honest stock of current reality; and then use the tension between current reality and vision as a map and a source of energy to get there. If the fidelity of our picture of current reality is warped, whatever we create will be as well. You can’t get somewhere else unless you know precisely where you are.